I'm not sure, but you may have to join the forum to read at the first link.
It is a trick.
A dirty trick to get you to joing that message board.
Petey-Po is the membership chair of that board and he is just trying to get more people to join.
Hopefully this dam removal in Milford won't go as bad!
Milford eyes cheaper plan for dam removal | NJ.com
---------- Post added at 07:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:30 PM ----------
....or this one on the Raritan. Interesting comments at the end of the article....
Fish will benefit from dam removal on the Raritan River, paid for by past owner of Tenneco plant in Raritan Twp. | NJ.com
Oddly enough there is a Mirror Lake in the Whippany drainage that the Whippany River Watershed Action Committee (WRWAC) is watching with the same situation. This group is leaning towards dam removal since it is much cheaper. The WRWAC will then propose a bio-retention basin which is something with a lot of interest on the Whippany side. It's all about ground water replacement and flooding mitigation (and goose management) these days with porous pavement, bio-retention basins, filterra units, and rain barrels (remember them!). We are trying to disconnect storm water sources from direct entry into streams, which seems odd with TU's mission of connecting streams. However, the TU version is connecting sections of stream not disconnecting rain gutters from streams.