MACFLY
Too many streams too little time
Somebody should shoot the other soon don't y'all think? Take it easy friends, off to check out a Scadden 2-man I might buy.
2 man..that means you can take on passengers. Sign me up
Somebody should shoot the other soon don't y'all think? Take it easy friends, off to check out a Scadden 2-man I might buy.
2 man..that means you can take on passengers. Sign me up
If you believe everything in Gasland to be true, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
Hollywood at its finest.
If you believe everything in Gasland to be true, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
Hollywood at its finest.
Never quite understood that... is the bridge in Brooklyn or Manhattan?
Anyway, if just one thing is true...
:beer:
That would have been a good one about 2 months ago, but I spoke to BP CEO Tony Hayward 7 weeks ago and he said the issue was being resolved. Its gotta be fixed by now, especially since he's yacht racing in Europe!! Mark that one as taken care of :thumb:And if you believe everything the drilling companies are telling you to be true I've got a oil well in the gulf to sell you!
If you believe everything in Gasland to be true, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
Hollywood at its finest.
At least that is honest.
Agust
This coming from the guy who lied in this post:
".........after all the drilling companies and FF have promised us it's safe."
Hilarious..."
So let me get this straight, you think drilling for gas is unsafe but want to do it anyway? That either makes you a fool or a tool, neither of which makes you a person who others listen too.
Interesting that you find the threat of catastrophic lose of the Delaware River Hilarious, most of us are concerned or scared.
Agust
Apples to oranges my friend. When the bossman says I can ride my horse to work and let it crap outside the building all day, I'll leave my truck at home. Until then, a car is a necessity for most of us who need it to make a living somewhere. Im not happy about the emissions and pollution they cause, but theres no way around them at this point in time. There is a way around drilling in the Catskills.. go do it somewhere else. The Catskills have within it 700,000 acres of NY Forest Preserve. This land is susceptible to all the negative possibilities involved in drilling on private or public land. I've been told that the landowners living in the Catskills are the true stewards of the land and it should ultimately be their decision what to do on this issue. Thats BS if you ask me. Why should a bunch of people who can benefit from drilling be making such biased decisions that can destroy a preserved ecosystem outside private land? The only people arguing for drilling on these threads are those with something to gain, whether its from lease money or somehow helping their industry. The rest of us simply enjoy the beauty of the Catskills and would hate to see their allure disappear because of selfish "stewards." You can argue pro drilling all you want want, but it just shows the rest of us where nature stands on your list of importances. For many, it gives us our sanity and piece of mind and is not worth the risk/reward ratio.I can't promise that driving a car is safe. I don't want to ban that. You drive a car. Are you a fool? Tens of thousands of people die every year due to cars. Doesn't that make them less safe than gas drilling...
Apples to oranges my friend. When the bossman says I can ride my horse to work and let it crap outside the building all day, I'll leave my truck at home. Until then, a car is a necessity for most of us who need it to make a living somewhere.
Im not happy about the emissions and pollution they cause, but theres no way around them at this point in time. There is a way around drilling in the Catskills.. go do it somewhere else. The Catskills have within it 700,000 acres of NY Forest Preserve. This land is susceptible to all the negative possibilities involved in drilling on private or public land.
I've been told that the landowners living in the Catskills are the true stewards of the land and it should ultimately be their decision what to do on this issue. Thats BS if you ask me. Why should a bunch of people who can benefit from drilling be making such biased decisions that can destroy a preserved ecosystem outside private land?
The only people arguing for drilling on these threads are those with something to gain, whether its from lease money or somehow helping their industry. The rest of us simply enjoy the beauty of the Catskills and would hate to see their allure disappear because of selfish "stewards."
You can argue pro drilling all you want want, but it just shows the rest of us where nature stands on your list of importances. For many, it gives us our sanity and piece of mind and is not worth the risk/reward ratio.
No. You, my friend, make choices. You could live within walking or biking or public transportation distance from your job. For most, that choice would suck. SO in order for you to live where you CHOOSE to AND make the MONEY you WANT to, you need a vehicle to get you from one place to the other. Life would be so less convenient without a vehicle. You weigh the risks (40,000 vehicle related deaths each year in the US (and untold temporary and permanent injuries) ) and choose to drive or ride in one. You choose to transport you kids and pets around in them. Me too. We don't let a threat of an accident stop us from living our lives the way we want to. Would you have a problem if there was a proposed ban on people like us owning a vehicle because there will be accidents and people WILL DIE?
EVERYONE has an idea of what place is important to him. Who chooses then whose nirvana is exposed to possible risks? We love the Catskills. Someone else might love the desert or the gulf coast, or Alaska or Nebraska. Again, who chooses where to drill?
You may think it is BS, but in the NYC Water shed, who owns most of the land that FOR DECADES has kept your trout happy with relatively clean water?
Who pays the taxes? Who, for the most part, keeps the land "less" developed. Do you think that they WANT their land to be sullied?
You say that people who might have something to gain should not make the decision... Should people who MIGHT have something to lose make the decision? Let the decision be based on science. Gas drilling should be treated EXACTLY how any other business with dire risks is treated.
Just because one has something to gain does not mean that their arguments are not valid. Base the arguments on facts.
"Selfish Stewards"... looking to make some money on their investment... I guess they could sell their land to developers when the time comes when they can't pay the bills... that would be ok? Maybe the Catskills will look like western Jersey where farmers were forced to sell due to tax increases... Just realize that most of these people when they get their money, are going to spend it too. It's not just the landowners that will reap the financial benefits. The money will go a long way in helping these communities support themslves.
Think of it as a redistribution of wealth. Downstaters burn the gas and pay the gas companies and in turn the gas companies will give the landowners that downstate money for the gas they will then sell to downstaters. Think of it as repayment for all the years of clean water upstaters have provided and will continue to provide.
You couldn't be more wrong. Nature is right up there on my list. It is why I live where I live and it is why I will stay here forever. Every morning I wake up here(see below). I've lived on this property 30 years. It's never once been logged in that time(not that I'm against the practice) and I've not had to sub divide and sell. I'm open to gas drilling, but I belong to a coalition of other folks who have devised a lease(with attorneys familiar with the practices of the drilling companies) that includes MANY protections that are NOT included on company leases to better the chances it be done the RIGHT way. Gas drilling WILL COME(because you people continue to burn it) and the coalition wants to ensure that our lands are protected as much as possible.[/QUOTE
Hey John I am interested to know which law firm you used. I have a friend that is looking to do the same thing up in Northeast PA. He has about 1400 acres of land. I think this kind of approach is very innovative and done correctly can go a long way to protect the natural resources even when government enforcement seems to be lacking...Now about that sub division
...Now about that sub division
Anyway, money walks for most people and although you have a great spread and love the outdoors, I still think you're just selling out or you'd be against anything that could ruin that great vista of yours, even if the risk is "slim." Just my opinion.
Im lucky to have a job in this economy nevermind working where I want and not having to drive there. I wish that wasnt the case, but its out of my hands.
yes, many of us are very fortunate, but that is a huge cop-out. i'm sure any of us could lead a much lower impact life with a simple realignment of priorities. we (myself included) are just not ready to make such a leap yet.
If I log the land, fertilize a field, hunt bambi, build a home or even put in a lawn, SOMEBODY will believe I'm screwing Mother Nature.
Cop-out? How so? Im a NJ state employee. If you've heard anything about the jobs and cuts made by our governor in state jobs, you'd know where Im coming from. I have a 20 min commute which Im more than content with. If I could work closer, I would. I've watched MANY coworkers pack it up with the layoffs. Between my vegan old lady, my hunting to fill the freezer, our heating soley with wood, and our organic garden, Im not sure how much greener I can get this day in age, but I guess theres always room for more change. I dont think Im copping out in any way though. The job is to pay the mortgage. I know everyone can live their life the way they feel fit and I do not look down upon their choices in anyway, BUT when their choices involve gas drilling that can "possibly" affect a vulnerable nature preserve I feel like voicing an opinion (and that's all it really is, no hard feelings).
I hear what you're saying, but disagree in at least one aspect. Where would one live if they didn't own a house or property (without the government kicking them out). A place to live is def a necessity in my book and order to have that these days, you need a job to pay for it. Those days are gone where one could build a hermitage and not get bothered by big brother. Even the homeless camps that continually pop up eventually get shut down.BB - it's a cop-out because we prefer to live this way, we dont "need" to. we don't "need" a mortgage
. Everyone that is interested should check out a book by Ed Begley called living like Ed.
You can't possibly be telling us all to buy a BOOK... Think of all those trees, Macfly! Is it out for the Amazon Kindle? Wait a minute...mountain top coal removal for the electricity and that damn cellular radiation killing off the bees...