Rather than making the difficult decisions regarding public pensions and benefits, Corzine has proposed only higher taxes. Cuts in areas like state parks are a miniscule part of the state budget. Maybe we should just sell everything to developers in an effort to close the budget gap.
I'd rather see a 25% to 30% cut in the state work force. I'm sure the only one that would miss them is the governor at reelection.
One thing that hasn't been made clear is what the real impact of these closures will be. If they close High Point, does that mean that you can't swim or climb to the top of the tower any more, but you will still be able to use the hiking trails and picnic areas.....or does it mean they are going to lock the entrance roadways? Same with Round Valley....closing the beach from swimming is a lot different from locking the park gates.
I'm no fan of the current budget, or of the way that the administration is spinning everything. Cuts are being proposed more for an emotional response than they are for true fiscal responsibility. The way he handled the union contract negotiations was a sin. The school board in my small township did a better job negotiating the last contract with the NJEA.
Not locking the gates, just not allowing certain activities. Stephens State Park, for example, will be open but you can't camp there. High Point won't allow swimming (don't know about climbing the tower which they recently re-opened). Corzine is an idiot, but what is going to change? Our state remains in control of liberals and moderates (in that order) that got us into this mess and we will remain in their grasp until the state declares bankruptcy one day
We can't keep voting in the same party expecting them to change. It's like the old definition of insanity - doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results...
Well Im no fan of liberal government but I dont recall the last republican governor being much better. In fact I remember how she raided the pension plan to prop up the budget and make the numbers look pretty.
Back to consolidation .......
For years I bought that consolidation is good for reasons of efficiency. I am an engineer after all. However, this is NJ and recent studies I saw indicated that smaller towns actually run more efficiently since they are smaller, more transparent organizations. The larger towns lose efficiency through bloated bureacracies and it is easier to hide corruption. When I mentioned the efficiency issue to a small town politician last night I got an earful about how many small towns have quietly formed joint school districts, share police etc. The small towns have limited budgets and they find the best ways to use their funds on their own - they have to be efficient. He didn't think the state dictates would save anyone money.
I wonder if Corzine is just bluffing on the park closures to get us to allow a tax increase of some sort??
Cdog
Macfly,
I hear you. There seems to be a ton of administrators in NJ. I lived in Illinios for 5 years and IL my taxes were 1/4 of my NJ taxes. Town taxes were the same or a tad more in IL - the difference was school taxes. I lived in suburban IL where teacher salaries/class size was equivalent and the big difference is beaucratic overhead.
Since the administrative overhead is so high, consolidation makes sense. However, be careful that the consolidation actually reduces costs. At work I have gone thrugh a number of consolidations the last few years and each time another layer of management is added and the overhead keeps going up! That is in private industry. I would imagine senior people holding on to jobs (they didn't get there with poor survival skills) and empire building would be no less in town and school politics.
First you tee it up, and then you swing! (pardon my bad golf analogy) He's a rich Democrat, raising taxes is all he knows.
Per a previous post. The agriculture department was not being eliminated. it was being consolidated into 2 other departments. I hear a lot of folks talking about making the cuts where all of the fat is but it really appears as if folks are saying anywhere but my area of interest.
PA: population is 12 plus million and there are currently 501 districts. I think we can agree that Pa is a little bigger than NJ and thus districts are more spread out. While I dont have salary numbers for PA for a comparison, its my opinion that a certain level of consolidation is warranted in NJ and could be done without harming the quality of education.
That's eliminated in gov't terms!! Besides the loss of jobs, do you really think the "consolidated" depts will do for NJ what the Dept of Agriculture has done for our state. I can see doing away with Personnnel because other depts already absorb much of what they do, and Commerce seems like it can be divided in my opinion, but if you like to fish in this state, you might want to think again. As per their website, much of Agriculture's vision is towards providing clean and healthy soil and water. They also oversee much of the fishing industry in our waters (clams, swordfish, whiting, etc) and make it their goal to keep these waters healthy, as well as fresh water. Furthermore, NJs 3rd largest income comes from agricluture.. not just farming is involved here, but the thousands of proccessing jobs, manufacturing jobs, etc. IMO this dept cant be "consolidated" without feeling the wrath. Only 2 other states in the whole country do not have an Dept of Agriculture. I see you live in PA, where you wouldn't need to worry. Hope this doesnt sound angry, but hopefully helps you understand what NJ would be facing.
P.S. Who was testing our meets the other week during recall?
Just one more thing on condensing school districts. If you merge districts, you may not have to pay as many superintendents, but you will surely have to hire more teachers, for classroom sizes would increase dramatically. The other option would be oversized classes, which means less teaching being done and a dumber NJ (which I really dont think we can afford at this point!).:dizzy: