...perception...channelizing...Reactionary...
Thanks for the reply!... Just some clarification and additional thoughts...
I do not condone the channelizing. The FUDR did what they had to do to stop the damage from being done... It's just a shame that there was no PR firm involved to reduce the "reactionary" impact
From an outsider's perspective (both to the FUDR and Hancock), it appears the town is still suffering from the effects of the floods. They (the town) apparently have not received enough recovery assistance to reduce the impact of the floods. They took matters into their own hands to "fix" the perceived problem. FUDR is trying to stop the "fix" as it will only worsen the damage already done and prolong recovery to the natural resource. To the residents, they are trying their hardest to prevent further damage to themselves and their property only being told to stop. Regardless of illegality of channelization how would anyone feel if they were told to stop trying to save themselves?
I would hope that the FUDR has acheived what it needed to do and stopped the channelizing. I would hope that the town has rec'd the needed resources to recover from the flood and to be in a better poisiton to accept the help the FUDR is offering them to better manage the resource.
If the people have not recovered sufficiently from the damaging effects of the flood, then they will not accept any help unless it clearly defines how it helps them now. Once the people are being taken care of (or the support is clearly visable), then efforts to restore the area in a manner that supports the local economy and the long term care of the fishery would be accepted. Let me clearly state that the FUDR is not responsible for what should be Federal Funding for Disaster Recovery. If there has been little to no support for the residents to recover, then the FUDR positioned itself to be the focal point of all the towns pent up frustration. Although not intended, this has become a balancing act between FUDR/long term solution and Hancock/ short term recovery.
The FUDR may want to the town to accept their help, but is it the help the town needs now?
While maybe a short sighted vision, for someone with a stream 20' away from their front door means nothing when you've lost everything you've owned.
The focus has to be the people first. (not saying that it isn't, but perception is reality)
It's a shame that the idiot that tripped over fallen debris and sued didn't use his clout to help out a financially strapped town first. Maybe he wouldn't have had to worry about the debris then....
and can the rest of you stop bickering? while its funny to read, some of you seem to take it waaay too personal. a few of you need a sense of humor and need to drop it...