Welcome to NEFF

Sign up for a new account today, or log on with your old account!

Give us a try!

Welcome back to the new NEFF. Take a break from Twitter and Facebook. You don't go to Dicks for your fly fishing gear, you go to your local fly fishing store. Enjoy!

Fisheries Recommendation for Management of Water Released to Delaware River Tributari

Joe D

Registered User
Harrisburg, PA – The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) today announced the release of a fisheries recommendation for management of water released to Delaware River tributaries from New York City water supply reservoirs.

The recommendation focuses on the Delaware River and its tributaries, the East Branch, West Branch and Neversink rivers where N.Y. City reservoirs are located.


“We worked closely with the New York state Department of Environmental Conservation in the development of this position and believe it is a strong statement for sound aquatic resource management which, if implemented, will be a significant step forward in managing Delaware River water for down-basin uses,” said Leroy Young, director of the PFBC Bureau of Fisheries. “We are pleased that the recommendation is protective of the upper Delaware River mainstem, which is a priority for Pennsylvania, as well as the tributaries.”


The report, entitled Recommended Improvements to the Flexible Flow Management Program for Coldwater Ecosystem Protection in the Delaware River Tailwaters, was completed on Jan. 12, 2010, and is a collaborative effort by both fishery agencies.


Over the past 50 years, water management in the Delaware River has been regulated by a 1954 U. S. Supreme Court decree. Subsequent management decisions have been made unanimously by parties to the decree that include N.Y. City, New York state, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.



The Delaware River Basin Commission, comprised of the basin states and a federal government representative, has additional interstate water management responsibilities under an interstate compact. The newly released fisheries position calls for improvements in the flexible flow management program (FFMP) that manages reservoir releases and expires in 2011.


The fisheries report sets management objectives and levels of protection for fisheries in various tributary and Delaware River segments downstream from water supply reservoirs. Reservoir release scenarios and a recent 10-year record of N.Y. City water supply needs were used as inputs into the operational analysis and simulation of integrated systems (OASIS) computer model. The OASIS model generated stream flow and reservoir storage information. These outputs were used with a second computer tool to predict fish habitat available for trout and other coldwater species in various seasons. The federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel was also considered.


The fisheries recommendation is condensed to a table of reservoir releases from Cannonsville, Pepacton and Neversink reservoirs that modifies the current FFMP to better support cold water ecosystems downstream of the reservoirs to the town of Callicoon. The majority of flow supporting Delaware fisheries is released from Cannonsville reservoir into the West Branch and the fisheries recommendation calls for 1.35 to 2 times the existing flow in the summer and winter when reservoirs are relatively full.
Young reports that trout spawning and incubation habitat, adult trout habitat, and riffle dwelling fish habitat all improve significantly under the recommendation. Summer temperatures should be more favorable for trout and cold water fishes in the upper Delaware River mainstem. Dwarf wedgemussels will be protected by the fisheries proposal.


A complete copy of the recommended improvements to the FFMP can be found on the PFBC website at Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission under Featured Topics.


The mission of the Fish and Boat Commission is to protect, conserve, and enhance the Commonwealth’s aquatic resources and provide fishing and boating opportunities. For more information about fishing and boating in Pennsylvania, please visit our website at Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission.
 
Harrisburg, PA – The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) today announced the release of a fisheries recommendation for management of water released to Delaware River tributaries from New York City water supply reservoirs.

The recommendation focuses on the Delaware River and its tributaries, the East Branch, West Branch and Neversink rivers where N.Y. City reservoirs are located.


“We worked closely with the New York state Department of Environmental Conservation in the development of this position and believe it is a strong statement for sound aquatic resource management which, if implemented, will be a significant step forward in managing Delaware River water for down-basin uses,” said Leroy Young, director of the PFBC Bureau of Fisheries. “We are pleased that the recommendation is protective of the upper Delaware River mainstem, which is a priority for Pennsylvania, as well as the tributaries.”


The report, entitled Recommended Improvements to the Flexible Flow Management Program for Coldwater Ecosystem Protection in the Delaware River Tailwaters, was completed on Jan. 12, 2010, and is a collaborative effort by both fishery agencies.


Over the past 50 years, water management in the Delaware River has been regulated by a 1954 U. S. Supreme Court decree. Subsequent management decisions have been made unanimously by parties to the decree that include N.Y. City, New York state, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.



The Delaware River Basin Commission, comprised of the basin states and a federal government representative, has additional interstate water management responsibilities under an interstate compact. The newly released fisheries position calls for improvements in the flexible flow management program (FFMP) that manages reservoir releases and expires in 2011.


The fisheries report sets management objectives and levels of protection for fisheries in various tributary and Delaware River segments downstream from water supply reservoirs. Reservoir release scenarios and a recent 10-year record of N.Y. City water supply needs were used as inputs into the operational analysis and simulation of integrated systems (OASIS) computer model. The OASIS model generated stream flow and reservoir storage information. These outputs were used with a second computer tool to predict fish habitat available for trout and other coldwater species in various seasons. The federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel was also considered.


The fisheries recommendation is condensed to a table of reservoir releases from Cannonsville, Pepacton and Neversink reservoirs that modifies the current FFMP to better support cold water ecosystems downstream of the reservoirs to the town of Callicoon. The majority of flow supporting Delaware fisheries is released from Cannonsville reservoir into the West Branch and the fisheries recommendation calls for 1.35 to 2 times the existing flow in the summer and winter when reservoirs are relatively full.
Young reports that trout spawning and incubation habitat, adult trout habitat, and riffle dwelling fish habitat all improve significantly under the recommendation. Summer temperatures should be more favorable for trout and cold water fishes in the upper Delaware River mainstem. Dwarf wedgemussels will be protected by the fisheries proposal.


A complete copy of the recommended improvements to the FFMP can be found on the PFBC website at Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission under Featured Topics.


The mission of the Fish and Boat Commission is to protect, conserve, and enhance the Commonwealth’s aquatic resources and provide fishing and boating opportunities. For more information about fishing and boating in Pennsylvania, please visit our website at Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission.

Thank,s Joe, Any "word" on the chances of table 1 ?
 
can somebody read this to me, I fell asleep twice, and my ADHD is stopping me from focusing for the needed amount of time to get through the article.
 
It sounds really good and it's great to see the states doing something cooperatively, but it is still constrained ny NYC's daily 800 mgd. diversion.

This study looks at actual real NYC diversions and models from there which shows again that there is plenty of water to protect and enhance the fishery.

It is exactly what all of the various groups have been saying for years.

The key is getting NYC to be real and let the releases be predicated on actual usage.

It is nice though I would have liked to see NJ on there too....
 
If approved it would be the biggest step forward since the reservoirs were built! Nice to see the NYS DEC finally get involved to protect the best wild fishery in the state. Now please stop stocking the East Branch! Thanks to all of those in FUDR and others who have not given up.

Ausable
 
This is great. Hopefully it will come to pass. Brachy how ever reminds us that not much is likely to happen. Having said this... the really nice thing about this document is that it spells out objectives for what any flow plan aims to meet. Objectives have been sorely missing from much of the conversation regarding Delaware flows.

Also... I strongly support the objectives laid out in the document. Many of us have long discussed the need to place priority on the WBD and to create a thermal refuge in the upper part of the Mainstem recognizing that there is not enough water in the system to cool the entire East Branch down and the Mainstem down to Calicoon. What this means is less of a release to the East Branch and Neversink and more water released from Cannonsville.
 
Its my understanding that they plan on doing away with temp gauges and will depend on the increased flow which may effect the quality of the fishing.

They have also done away with the water banks and actually may increase the reservoir levels.

I believe this is the only was NYC would agree to it.
 
I think the final FFMP is delayed until 2011 pending further studies. Hopefully, this report would be included in any criteria to be considered. The Dwarf Wedge Mussel studies, of which there were supposed to be two binding studies, have not been released. From what I know, they are complete, but for some reason, havent been released for inclusion. From the one study I did read, the flows needed for protection, roughly mirrored the same flows as this new report.

NJ Fred, maybe I read it wrong as I just kind of glossed over it, but it looks like they recommend increased flows on all rivers.

brachy
 
It would be increased flows from the Pepacton and the Cannonsville with the majority coming from the Cannonsville. The mussels from what I hear are being put on simmer for now. I have also read the report but I have some serious questions about it. I like them steamed better then simmered.

The Delaware system was a warm water fishery before the reservoirs and the mussels where here. Increased flows and colder water for the mussels have never been adaquately studied. There are only three areas in the upper delaware that support them far fewer then pre-dam era.

No studies were ever done on the mussels before the reservoirs where built.

I've also noticed that now there is no anchor ice Didymo has grown. I believe the ice limited its potential to grow. It has been around for quite a while usually you see it in late July and August.

I've never seen any studies done as to the effects of anchor ice, just my observation from living on the river most of my 50 years.
 
Last edited:
It sounds really good and it's great to see the states doing something cooperatively, but it is still constrained ny NYC's daily 800 mgd. diversion.

This study looks at actual real NYC diversions and models from there which shows again that there is plenty of water to protect and enhance the fishery.

It is exactly what all of the various groups have been saying for years.

The key is getting NYC to be real and let the releases be predicated on actual usage.

It is nice though I would have liked to see NJ on there too....

You didn't see NJ because the PA and NY agencies were pushing for thermal protections for coldwater species. By the time the D gets to the NJ line, it is no longer a coldwater fishery and no amount of sustainable releases would change that. As far as making an impact to get NYC to go along with better flows, NJ is actually the main driver right now through the DRBC. But our state's reasons for pushing for better flows are more for downstream states' drinking water needs and not as much for the trout/mussels.
 
Kilgour,
I absolutely agree with your anchor ice / dydymo observation.
Not prevelant in riffles and not on the Beaverkill or Willo, which get scoured pretty good.
 
You didn't see NJ because the PA and NY agencies were pushing for thermal protections for coldwater species. By the time the D gets to the NJ line, it is no longer a coldwater fishery and no amount of sustainable releases would change that. As far as making an impact to get NYC to go along with better flows, NJ is actually the main driver right now through the DRBC. But our state's reasons for pushing for better flows are more for downstream states' drinking water needs and not as much for the trout/mussels.


Brian,
I agree. I know that last year NJ DEP went out on a limb and issued a report recommending changes to the FFMP.
In tandem with this one and the DWM studies, I would hope that NYC could be persuaded to change their requirements.
But as we all know, NYC does whatever they want, weather it's dishonest diversion calculations or uncompensated property takings.
 
It would be increased flows from the Pepacton and the Cannonsville with the majority coming from the Cannonsville. The mussels from what I hear are being put on simmer for now. I have also read the report but I have some serious questions about it. I like them steamed better then simmered.

The Delaware system was a warm water fishery before the reservoirs and the mussels where here. Increased flows and colder water for the mussels have never been adaquately studied. There are only three areas in the upper delaware that support them far fewer then pre-dam era.

No studies were ever done on the mussels before the reservoirs where built.

I've also noticed that now there is no anchor ice Didymo has grown. I believe the ice limited its potential to grow. It has been around for quite a while usually you see it in late July and August.

I've never seen any studies done as to the effects of anchor ice, just my observation from living on the river most of my 50 years.

I totally agree with your ice theory.Before the winter releases started (06/07 )there was no mention of Didymo.After the winter releases started poof Didymo.The rivers use to freeze over as the freestones do,,As you know freezing Didymo kills it! I am sure it was around but not able to thrive with the rivers freezing

I actually called the DEC on this last year and it was poo poo'd.
 
Even the possibility of a consistent 400cfs release from Cannonsville for April and May, then upped a bit for June to August, would be great but it's hard to get your hopes up knowing how unlikely it is given NYC's history.
 
I totally agree with your ice theory.Before the winter releases started (06/07 )there was no mention of Didymo.After the winter releases started poof Didymo.The rivers use to freeze over as the freestones do,,As you know freezing Didymo kills it! I am sure it was around but not able to thrive with the rivers freezing

I actually called the DEC on this last year and it was poo poo'd.

I think, just through observation, that there are some unintended consequences from the higher winter flows.

The all summer long algae in the WB never occurred in the past until the reservoir was drawn down substantially. I remember when the WB would run crystal clear during the summer. Now we have had nasty green funk for the last 3 years, all summer, even when the reservoir was full. Is it related or a coincidence ?

There definitely is more silt in the system than when we had winter scourings and the change in bugs reflect that.

Of course, anchor ice has it's own problems, but I think I would rather have lower flows in the winter and more water for the rest of year.
 
Agree with you guys on the anchor ice. In fact it's been proven that if you freeze didymo it kills it which is why many of us, based upon observation and science believe higher winter flows maybe contributing to the Didymo blooms.

In terms of general algae blooms it's really tough to say. I believe that Caonnonsville water is continually sampled for fertilizer chemicals which can really impact algae growth. Recall seeing some of the data. Might be worth having a look at that to see if that's what's contributed to algae growth last couple of summers. Don't forget.. the reservoir did spill in to the summer last year and I"ll bet the no kill was warmer at least last year than other summers which could contribute to the growth of the stuff. There are so many variables it's hard to really pin point what's going on.
 
Hi Fred,
Totally agree that runoff and fertilizers can be contributing, but I see the algae way up at the weir, coming from the reservoir.

I called Paulachok, the rivermaster, last year to see what he thought. His response ?
"Oh gee, I didnt notice". Let me refer it to DEP to see what they think.
This is after it had been running for a month !!!

It definitely gets worse the lower you get so it may also be blooming in the stream and a lot of it is being kicked up by wading anglers.

I,m speculating here, but I think the constant release has changed the thermal turnover somehow and maybe the junk never has a chance to settle in the reservoir. It never used to occur until the reservoir was really drained in a dry year.

The river is definitely more silted up than ever before, except maybe after the flood and the bug life has moved around a lot.

We had fishable Green Drakes up in Stilesville last year for two weeks. Never saw that before.
 
Remember that Didymo flourishes with steady, lower flows out of tailwater systems and that is just what we have with the current L2 flows in the FFMP as it has been instituted thus far.

The anchor ice theory is an interesting one, although I have to admit not being an expert on that factor with relation to its affects on rock snot.

Brachy - you saw decent Green Drakes up at Stilesville last year? I missed that hatch last season, but would completely agree with you that increased siltation would be a prime culprit in seeing that burrowing mayfly that far upstream.
 
Brian,
These are only observations by myself and others, but the East Branch is loaded with Didymo, why isnt the Beaverkill and Willowemoc affected ?
Knock on wood for that one, but it is puzzling.

Yea, the GD's last year were strange, but it was killer on the entire system.
Ask Joe T. how he lost my biggest fish since I,ve been out there. :)
 
After the 06' flood alot of crap came out of the reservoirs. About a week after the water subsided they did a release and it was high and full of silt, never seen the river that dirty even during the flood.

Maybe they decided to clean the silt from the reservoirs while they had the chance with all the confusion that ensued.

They still say they didn't release water after the streams and river started receeding but something cause a wall of water. That did the real damage along the river up here.
 
Brian,
These are only observations by myself and others, but the East Branch is loaded with Didymo, why isnt the Beaverkill and Willowemoc affected ?
Knock on wood for that one, but it is puzzling.

Yea, the GD's last year were strange, but it was killer on the entire system.
Ask Joe T. how he lost my biggest fish since I,ve been out there. :)


GD'S were strong everwhere.That's the second year I saw them in Stilesville like that.

Gee thanks I was just kinda getting over it and started erasing it from my memory..I still feel bad about that one...Especially since I saw the monster that really did get away..Ah Forget it nobody would believe either of us anyway!

We'll make up for it on the Mo
 
GD'S were strong everwhere.That's the second year I saw them in Stilesville like that.

Gee thanks I was just kinda getting over it and started erasing it from my memory..I still feel bad about that one...Especially since I saw the monster that really did get away..Ah Forget it nobody would believe either of us anyway!

We'll make up for it on the Mo

I'd believe it! I saw my good friend fight (and lose) a huge brown in the upper WB a few years ago that I will not give accurate details about for fear that one of you will call the loony bin on me. Let's just say it was significantly larger than the mid- 20s fish we are all seeing with some regularity up there these days. I was only glad that my friend never actually got to see that fish up close as I was well downstream attempting to net it. He might have quite the game if he knew what he lost:crap:
 
I'd believe it! I saw my good friend fight (and lose) a huge brown in the upper WB a few years ago that I will not give accurate details about for fear that one of you will call the loony bin on me. Let's just say it was significantly larger than the mid- 20s fish we are all seeing with some regularity up there these days. I was only glad that my friend never actually got to see that fish up close as I was well downstream attempting to net it. He might have quite the game if he knew what he lost:crap:


This one was actually much larger than that.The low to mid 20's has been the typical story line the past couple of years.Never saw a fish that big on the D..Not even close.

Now I really feel bad , its fully back in my head again.Thanks Brachy!!
 
This one was actually much larger than that.The low to mid 20's has been the typical story line the past couple of years.Never saw a fish that big on the D..Not even close.

Now I really feel bad , its fully back in my head again.Thanks Brachy!!

I'm talking about a fish over 30"...and not a "reservoir fish". Suddenly my net looked like a teaspoon. That kind of fish.:fish:
 
Back
Top