Welcome to NEFF

Sign up for a new account today, or log on with your old account!

Give us a try!

Welcome back to the new NEFF. Take a break from Twitter and Facebook. You don't go to Dicks for your fly fishing gear, you go to your local fly fishing store. Enjoy!

Delaware River Basin Conservation Act

brachycentrus

Just finished a River Runs Through it!
Friends of the Upper Delaware River
Protecting People and Habitat


May 26, 2010

Dear FUDR Friends and Supporters:

I need 5 minutes of your time. I’ll explain why at the end of this letter.
I’m writing to call your attention to important proposed federal
legislation that would establish a program to protect the Delaware Basin.

The Delaware River Basin Conservation Act would provide $5,000,000 for each
fiscal year from 2011 to 2016. Funds would be used to implement a voluntary,
coordinated approach to sustaining and enhancing habitat, water quality and
flood control improvements for fish, wildlife and people. The bill is
currently in committee in the House of Representatives, and discussions are
underway to introduce a companion bill in the Senate.

I don’t believe there has ever been a more thoughtful, insightful proposal
to make resources available to help the upper Delaware River Basin. FUDR is
behind the proposal legislation 100 percent. We believe it would fund
precisely the sorts of projects that we have been working on, including
stream restoration.

Under the act, the federal Interior Secretary would coordinate a program that
would involve all four states in the basin, New York, Pennsylvania, New
Jersey and Delaware. The program would include a competitive grants component
to provide support for local, on-the-ground projects by non-profits,
universities, state and local governments, community organizations and
others. The grants could be used to support such things as wetlands
restoration and protection, flood mitigation and waterfront revitalization.

The bill has the support of a number of conservation organizations.

In many ways, the Delaware River Basin has lacked a coordinated
federal/state/local oversight effort, even though it is home to more than 8
million people and provides drinking water to 15 million. Other major
American watersheds, including the Great Lakes and the Chesapeake Bay, get
tens of millions of dollars in federal funding for conservation coordination.
The Delaware Basin get relatively little funding, and the upper basin gets
none.

The lack of coordination leaves the Basin vulnerable. The Delaware River is
the longest undammed river east of the Mississippi. Management of the river
and water volume in the Basin is critical to flood control and habitat for
fish and wildlife. Following three major floods in the past five years along
the river, the governors of the four Basin states have called for protection
of natural flood control mechanisms to combat the problem.

Existing programs have limited resources to fully address the habitat,
recreation and water challenges in the Basin in a coordinated manner.
The Delaware River Basin Conservation Act (H.R. 4698) was introduced on Feb.
25 by U.S. Rep. Michael Castle (R-Del.) and has bipartisan co-sponsorship by
U.S. Reps. Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.), Rush Holt (D-N.J.), Charles Dent (R-Pa.)
and Joe Sestak (D.-Pa.).

So here’s where I need those 5 minutes of your time.

It is vital for individuals, municipalities and organizations within the
Delaware Basin to contact their federal representatives to voice support for
the legislation. You can find a list of Basin congressmen at the
Northeast-Midwest Institute website at www.nemw.org/delaware. Please visit
your congressman’s website and send an email thanking them for supporting
H.R. 4698, the proposed Delaware River Basin Conservation Act. (These days,
politicians prefer emails to old-fashioned letters. Their websites make it
very easy to comment via email, generally under the “Contact” icon.)

This is a great opportunity for us to draw long overdue funding and attention
to our vital and precious natural resource.
Thank you.

Dan Plummer
FUDR Board Chairman
 
They're TAG grants, Technical Assistant Grants, usually reserved for municipalities. This program will be administered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Don't expect much at the upper basin. Most will be earmarked for the lower basin, sorry.
 
Brachy,

With my typing skills it took twelve minutes, but I was able to shoot my reps a bunch of email. Thanks for the heads up. I hope everyone takes the time.

Have a great holiday weekend,

Brough
 
Last edited:
I have not read the Legislation as of yet ( It is a time issue) When I hear anything in it with flood control attached to it. I have visions of bull dozers in the river. And new dam projects. I hope this not the case. Are there any plans in this project to build dams or deepening the river?
 
So no one heeded my advice a few years ago and are still poking their noses into the DRBC. Here's how you get the water back into the fishery- Anyone with a Real Estate license should not be involved in any conversations with and water authority. Any organization that is represented by an acronym should be disbanded. Leave the authorities alone and maybe some day they will forget about all the badgering, whining, nasty rhetoric, etc. and finally turn the water back on. Back off and maybe the water will turn back on!

You dopes will not be happy until the water is boiling by Memorial Day weekend...back off! You, have made a bad situation worse! Your intentions are noble but the proof is in the pudding. What you are doing is not working and falling on a deaf ear. The FFMP is an abject failure and any idiot knows the water needs to be released during dry periods, not when it's raining. Make fools of yourselves by taking a few more victory laps in January when the flow is 3,000 and there is no more anchor ice...big deal! Give me that flow in June, July and August.
 
So no one heeded my advice a few years ago and are still poking their noses into the DRBC. Here's how you get the water back into the fishery- Anyone with a Real Estate license should not be involved in any conversations with and water authority. Any organization that is represented by an acronym should be disbanded. Leave the authorities alone and maybe some day they will forget about all the badgering, whining, nasty rhetoric, etc. and finally turn the water back on. Back off and maybe the water will turn back on!

You dopes will not be happy until the water is boiling by Memorial Day weekend...back off! You, have made a bad situation worse! Your intentions are noble but the proof is in the pudding. What you are doing is not working and falling on a deaf ear. The FFMP is an abject failure and any idiot knows the water needs to be released during dry periods, not when it's raining. Make fools of yourselves by taking a few more victory laps in January when the flow is 3,000 and there is no more anchor ice...big deal! Give me that flow in June, July and August.

The FFMP is the complete failure it was forecast to be be from the beginning. It is the water when you don't need it and no water when you need it plan.

It was opposed by many and even by conservation/fishery organizations. The shame of this failed plan, amongst other things, is that there is no provision for a thermal bank. There was some rediculous provision that could never be met, and even that was removed and never replaced with anything.

Fortunately, that organization that pushed this plan has disbanded since they "met their goal". Now, maybe a real water plan can be put in place.
 
So no one heeded my advice a few years ago and are still poking their noses into the DRBC. Here's how you get the water back into the fishery- Anyone with a Real Estate license should not be involved in any conversations with and water authority. Any organization that is represented by an acronym should be disbanded. Leave the authorities alone and maybe some day they will forget about all the badgering, whining, nasty rhetoric, etc. and finally turn the water back on. Back off and maybe the water will turn back on!

You dopes will not be happy until the water is boiling by Memorial Day weekend...back off! You, have made a bad situation worse! Your intentions are noble but the proof is in the pudding. What you are doing is not working and falling on a deaf ear. The FFMP is an abject failure and any idiot knows the water needs to be released during dry periods, not when it's raining. Make fools of yourselves by taking a few more victory laps in January when the flow is 3,000 and there is no more anchor ice...big deal! Give me that flow in June, July and August.

And you were a knucklehead a few years ago and time has done nothing to change that.

You are absolutely right, the FFMP is a disaster. It will be changed upon renewal next year. Read the recent historic joint White Paper by NY DEC and PFB. I think that because of that study, releases will be larger on June 1, than stipulated in the current FFMP. None of this comes without pressure by the effected constituencies.

Finally, the Decree parties are open to challenging NYC and using actual historic usage to come up with arriving at a FFMP that works.

If you want to sit behind your computer and lob smart ass remarks, more power to you.
 
Last edited:
Not trying to lob smart ass remarks and I am curious by your defensive posturing...do you sell real estate?:) Just pointing out the obvious...why not try my approach and back off and see what transpires? Oh yeah, then you won't be able to raise money

There has been negative progress since my initial remarks and until that changes, I believe that makes you the knucklehead.
 
Not trying to lob smart ass remarks and I am curious by your defensive posturing...do you sell real estate?:) Just pointing out the obvious...why not try my approach and back off and see what transpires? Oh yeah, then you won't be able to raise money

There has been negative progress since my initial remarks and until that changes, I believe that makes you the knucklehead.


http://fishandboat.com/water/rivers/delaware/dela_flex_flow.pdf

Actually, despite the abysmal current FFMP, there has been a lot of progress.

One of the reasons, if not the main reason we got stuck with this plan is that NYC saw division amongst user groups arguing amongst themselves over which plan was best. You were one of the people stoking that fire.

If you got over your little hissy fit and got involved, you might see some of that progress.
We are stuck with this release regimen until next year.
I personally wish that NYC could be dragged into court for their intentional mismanagement of the resource. I would like to see the Supreme Court decision overturned and a new policy implemented. But for now, it looks like all we can do is put a united front on the bastards and not repeat the mistakes of the past.

And no, I do not sell real estate, but I do have a stake in a healthy fishery.
 
I have not read the Legislation as of yet ( It is a time issue) When I hear anything in it with flood control attached to it. I have visions of bull dozers in the river. And new dam projects. I hope this not the case. Are there any plans in this project to build dams or deepening the river?

Read the letter, it states natural flood control mechanisms (ie. restoring flood plains where possible, amongst other things.) They aren't looking to build any flood control dams.
 
"You were one of the people stoking that fire."

No, people like Coz, Serio, Miri, the renegade scientist from Columbia and Finley were the ones chirping in the ears of the DRBC and switching from one organization to another, creating bad feelings. I was correct that the DRBC & NYC were being spiteful and not releasing, as you just stated. I did not cause or create this problem, I was merely pointing out the obvious flaws in the tacts that were being taken by the "acronym-ers". It is painful to know I was right....


"If you got over your little hissy fit and got involved, you might see some of that progress."

Again, you must be reading something different than me, I am stating the obvious and chuckling by your incorrect and defensive assertions. I have the satisfaction of being correct without hindsight, no hissy fit necessary. Lastly, why would I get off of my couch, as you say, and get involved in dysfunctional and poorly run groups that have done more harm than good? Are you suggesting I start my own organization and waste my time battling the acronym groups and getting nothing accomplished...where's my TV guide? :nose-picking:
 
"You were one of the people stoking that fire."

No, people like Coz, Serio, Miri, the renegade scientist from Columbia and Finley were the ones chirping in the ears of the DRBC and switching from one organization to another, creating bad feelings. I was correct that the DRBC & NYC were being spiteful and not releasing, as you just stated. I did not cause or create this problem, I was merely pointing out the obvious flaws in the tacts that were being taken by the "acronym-ers". It is painful to know I was right....


"If you got over your little hissy fit and got involved, you might see some of that progress."

Again, you must be reading something different than me, I am stating the obvious and chuckling by your incorrect and defensive assertions. I have the satisfaction of being correct without hindsight, no hissy fit necessary. Lastly, why would I get off of my couch, as you say, and get involved in dysfunctional and poorly run groups that have done more harm than good? Are you suggesting I start my own organization and waste my time battling the acronym groups and getting nothing accomplished...where's my TV guide? :nose-picking:

You are wrong on so many of your assertions. You have your group members all mixed up.
I understand that you are challenged by this fishery, so stick to Lake George where you could troll for your lakers.

For once, all of the stakeholders are lined up. FUDR is doing great work after they reorganized. The town of Hancock is working with us on several restoration projects. Matching grants have been given and spent within the community. You must be under a rock somewhere.

The bottom line here is that with all of this wasteful stimulus and TARP money being spread around to stimulate local economies, all you need to do up here is open a freakin valve, The local economy suffers without a vibrant fishery.
 
Challenged by the fishery? Now that's the first humorous thing you have ever said. I enjoy challenges so if you want if you think that you can outfish, outcast and out-tie me on the D, I have one thing to say...come to pappa:)!
 
Challenged by the fishery? Now that's the first humorous thing you have ever said. I enjoy challenges so if you want if you think that you can outfish, outcast and out-tie me on the D, I have one thing to say...come to pappa:)!


I would like to take you up on that .But I should let you know "when Tom hits the water the fish come to order":sleeping:
 
Brachy-ol'-boy talks a great game, but when it's time to put his money where his pie hole is....you can hear the crickets:)

"Challenged by the fishery"...he still has me chuckling on that one.

Emmett
 
Back
Top