dcabarle
Administrator
So what say you now?
Does Jim's response cast doubt over ANYTHING that your "contacts" might say? It's unfortunate that we do not know who said what. Of course, transparency in that regard, is too much to ask, yes?
I beleive Dennis is entitled to his thoughts, but I'm not so sure I agree with his thought process. I think I would have done things a little different myself.
For instance; after contacting the DRBC, NASA, FUDR, ACLU, NAACP, NHRA, USGS, NYDEC, NJDMV, and a few other non-associated organizations such as Jim Jones (It's just juice, trust me), I believe I would have afforded myself the opportunity to contact the DRF and possibly TU, just to see what they had to say, before rushing to the judgement that all non-believers are going to hell.
Now if Dennis mentioned that he did contact TU and someone from the DRF, then made the decision to support someone else, I could respect that. Listening to a 1 sided story and basing your support on that side without even giving the opposition the same opportunity to answer the same questions, in my opinion is not my idea of due diligence.
Could you imagine Dennis as a judge in a courtroom... The prosecutor gets up and explains his case (Let's take the Duke Case for example)... Then when the defense stands up to offer a defense statement, he puts on a set of headphones and starts playing the air guitar to his favorite Clapton tune. The song is over and the defense says, "Your honor, it's clear there is no evidence to support the States case". The judge says, "Yep, you're right... it's clear to me that they're all guilty... Putem away for life."
Oooph... That's rough.
Last edited: