Welcome to NEFF

Sign up for a new account today, or log on with your old account!

Give us a try!

Welcome back to the new NEFF. Take a break from Twitter and Facebook. You don't go to Dicks for your fly fishing gear, you go to your local fly fishing store. Enjoy!

One More Reason Not to Belong to NJ Sierra Club

Stonefly

Conservation isn't a tag line...
Open Season on the Environment and Black Bears

Trenton – This afternoon acting DEP Commissioner Bob Martin approved the black bear policy setting the stage for a hunt. The Commissioner acted in haste and did not complete an adequate review. Martin has not engaged or spoken with organizations that support non-lethal forms of management. The Sierra Club finds it shocking that the DEP moved forward approving rules to hunt bears, at a time when other rules are being bottled up by the Red Tape Commission and Executive Orders.

The bear hunt violates governor Christies own Executive Orders. The DEP did not consider an economic analysis and this practice exceeds federal standards. More than 28 rules have been frozen by the Christie Administration; it is inexplicable that during this 90 day moratorium they have moved forward with the bear hunt rule.

“Yesterday the Acting Commissioner allowed more toxins in our drinking water based on the Executive Orders. Today he has allowed the bear hunt to move forward,” said Jeff Tittel, Director New Jersey Sierra Club. “It seems he is more concerned with hunting bears than protecting the drinking water for people in New Jersey.”

There has not been a strong justification for the hunt, and non-lethal bear management policies have not been properly implemented. This will set back management of bears and wildlife in New Jersey.

“With budget cuts backs, Executive Orders, and other roll backs it’s not just black bears being hunted, it’s also the environment,” said Tittel.

New Jersey has significantly cut back funds for bear management, including eliminating the bear warden program as well as cutting funds for officers providing education programs and bear aversion therapy, and other non-lethal methods of management. By cutting these funds, the state has eliminated the possibility of any type of effective bear management program and is now looking towards a hunt, which will not solve the problem of nuisance bears.

“Today’s action by the Governor is a step backward for bear management in New Jersey,” Tittel said. “A hunt is not a bear management program.”

This is not a management hunt, it’s a recreational hunt. Nuisance bears living under decks or behind sheds will not be affected by this hunt, since it will be focused in woodlands and areas such as Pequannock Watershed.

“While the hunt will kill docile bears in the middle of the forest, nuisance bears living under decks next to houses will remain,” Tittel said.

The Sierra Club supports an effective bear management plan that combines non-lethal methods of dealing with bears, public education, and steps that properly handle garbage.

The most important component in an effective bear management plan is education. More than half a million New Jerseyans live in bear country, but many of them do not have the expertise or experience to understand bears and know how to avoid confrontations with them. At the most basic level, people need to be taught that bears are wild animals and should be treated with respect and from a distance. People must be educated that feeding bears as they would pets is dangerous and will lead to aggressive behavior in the future.

Whether or not there is a hunt, New Jersey must deal with garbage or we’ll keep creating nuisance bears. Without a concerted effort to codify and enforce requirements on garbage, other bear policies will fail. The state needs to mandate bear-proof containers and locking dumpsters in bear country and ban the practice of leaving garbage out overnight. Garbage is a source of food for bears. If an abundant supply of trash is readily available, the bear population will increase and bears will become more aggressive as they learn that houses are good places to find food.

Other ways New Jersey can manage its bear population and avoid a hunt include:

· Protecting habitat: Every year the state loses 8,000-10,000 acres of land in bear country. The more we build houses in the middle of the woods where bears live, the more conflict we will see between bears and humans.
· Non-lethal methods of dealing with conflicts between bears and humans: One of the most important programs that has been cut is bear aversion therapy, which trains bears to be afraid of humans and, thus, to avoid them.
· Bear-proofing important public areas: The state should work with towns and municipalities to put up fencing and take other steps to keep bears out of key areas, such as playgrounds.
· Working with farmers: The state needs to cooperate with the agricultural sector to provide small grants to farmers that allow them to bear-proof their properties and protect them from potential damage.
· Conservation officers: The state should have conservation officers and bear wardens to address bear complaints and educate the public about bears.

“The black bear is a symbol that we still have wild places in New Jersey and the whole state has not been paved over with subdivisions and strip malls,” Tittel said. “As New Jersey continues to suburbanize and more people move into bear country, we should be managing bears and protecting habitat instead of getting rid of the bears. We shouldn’t have a hunt just because it may be hard to sell condos in Vernon to people in Brooklyn in there’s bears in the area.”



 
These people live in a fantasy world. How many bears have actually bedded under decks and behind sheds?(I have heard of one) Are farmers and home owners going to construct barriers around their property? Is every one in "bear country" going to be forced to buy bear-proof garbage cans? Or, are we going to have to wait at home for the truck and only bring them our garbage then?

Bears will smell the garbage and investigate anyway. You are going to have more and more animals competeing for food, and they will get more aggressive. Just like you wont be able to hunt all the problem bears, you can't adversly condition all of them either.

Sierra Club:give-the-finger:

lh
 
Other ways New Jersey can manage its bear population and avoid a hunt include:

·Protecting habitat: Every year the state loses 8,000-10,000 acres of land in bear country. The more we build houses in the middle of the woods where bears live, the more conflict we will see between bears and humans.

Interesting recommendation, considering Mr. Tittel opposed the recent efforts to get additional funding for open space through the Open Space question on last year's ballot.
 
These people are ass monkeys. The Sierra Club has become a shill for the likes of PETA and other bottom of the food-chain, uneducated herbivores. A few facts:

- The biologist I spoke to, when we were tagging and testing a bear, told me that at the rate the population is growing, it needs to be reduced 22-24% a year to remain healthy. Last hunt reduced it nly 18%. Would the tree huggers rather see them wiped out by disease?

- The Yogi bears that live in the woods are the same ones that eat your garbage and pet bunnies. Like deer, they've adapted to the suburban habitat.

- I'm sure the folks who live in Highland Lakes and Vernon are just tickled pink that all the "problem bears" that are trapped are sent to Waywayonda State Park, and can't wait for more to be available for some good wholesome yard trashing.

- The industrial revolution happened, people screw and push out puppies, get over it.
 
Protecting habitat: Every year the state loses 8,000-10,000 acres of land in bear country. The more we build houses in the middle of the woods where bears live, the more conflict we will see between bears and humans.

What a crock of shit that is. Since the "highlands act", new housing in "bear country" has been brought to an abrupt halt. these left wing tree hugging whacko's never let the facts get in the way of their fictional rants. The highlands act was also another example of well intended yet silly legislation.
 
Protecting habitat: Every year the state loses 8,000-10,000 acres of land in bear country. The more we build houses in the middle of the woods where bears live, the more conflict we will see between bears and humans.

What a crock of shit that is. Since the "highlands act", new housing in "bear country" has been brought to an abrupt halt. these left wing tree hugging whacko's never let the facts get in the way of their fictional rants. The highlands act was also another example of well intended yet silly legislation.
the sierra club is like most other non profits.the executives in charge are there for the easy job and the money and benefits that come with it.the hide these benefits even though they are supposed to disclose them to the public.just try and see how much any of them make and what their benefits are.the larger the non profit the more they can benefit.they do provide a lot of good services to the environment,but the general members are never told how much the executives are compensated.
 
the sierra club is like most other non profits.the executives in charge are there for the easy job and the money and benefits that come with it.the hide these benefits even though they are supposed to disclose them to the public.just try and see how much any of them make and what their benefits are.the larger the non profit the more they can benefit.they do provide a lot of good services to the environment,but the general members are never told how much the executives are compensated.

All such information is public and very readily available.
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
Back
Top