Welcome to NEFF

Sign up for a new account today, or log on with your old account!

Give us a try!

Welcome back to the new NEFF. Take a break from Twitter and Facebook. You don't go to Dicks for your fly fishing gear, you go to your local fly fishing store. Enjoy!

Upper Delaware River - PA / NY

I do think that launch limits, as they do out West, on some crowded rivers, is not a bad idea at some point in the future as it sure looks like it will eventually become too crowded (some think now). Not sure how it would be implemented or policed. How is it done out West?

It won't however do anything regarding the number of waders accessing the system.
 
Last edited:
Yes...in the NEAR future I do believe launch limits will be necessary.....also; sections of these waters will have to be CLOSED to all drifters during certain days of the week to rest them...this is done effectively on certain rivers in MT........


Now comes the hard part...yes guys; the truth sometimes hurts...talk it over with your mother if you desire....I know; most of the blame falls on the DRC, WBA, Border Water Outfitters, Catskill Flies and the others...but YOU were the one who made the decision...

Ok...all you drifters...stand up...move away from your computer...it's best to go outside(even if you're at work)....and shout out loud three times with your fists in the air..."I am a weenie fisherman !!"...................CDun.
 
Cd you and JW1970 and I have the old school attitude. Most of the wade fisherman and driftboat clientel are novicies at best. I have been fishing this system for almost 20yrs. and the past 6 or so seasons have gotten worse. I think it's time for the wrist rock and some steel shot. See, I'm enviromentally friendly, I could use lead. CD, I'm having trouble e-mailing you with the pics. I promised. Please PM. Thanks

Rich:iagree:
 
iFliFish said:
But I have to give you a "GROAN" for the second part of your post, Future.

Yeah, I hear ya. But It's too good;I've got to throw that out there every chance I get. I have to use this one too. Bruce Springsteen's "Before you make a wish son, you better think first, because with every wish, there comes a curse". :)

How've you been? I bet the fishing is GREAT!
 
Babyblue,CDUM, JW and all the old school fishermen

Your time has passed. Its time for a new generation of river runs through it, shadow casting, driftboat guide hiring, Patagonia flourescent vest wearing, where can i get a mocachino drinking, dont like old farts on the river fishing, local hick hating, caught my first trout on a chernobyl ant catching, need to anchor up in the middile of junction pool firshing, what else can I say new breed fisherman. We are coming to your town and boxing you out, running over your fish, insulting your kin folk, and generally making a nuisance of ourselves. You can fire your wrist rocket at me but it would be like brining a knife to a gun fight and for all your bravado I wonder if any of you have ever shot live ammo at another human being:rip: Bring your wrist rocket cause I got something for your in return.
 
I've read most of the posts on this thread with some interest. The one commonality that comes through is that there's no satisfying any group of fly fishers on this water. Whether the topic is 'guides', 'boats' of whatever shape, 'water levels', private property and access, privatization of land, defoliation and land clearing, FUDR vs. the other group(forgot the acronym), or whatever the topic, there never seems to be any agreement or even concensus. Maybe that's why, "After all is said and done, more is said than done".

So keep it up. Keep fighting among yourselves. Alienate each other. If nothing else it makes for good reading.

Allan
 
Macfly: I've been fishing as you suggested, therefore missing out on all the fun after my last post. At any rate, here's what I saw:

Hyde, Hyde, Clacka, pontoon, pontoon, clacka, hyde, toon. 5 other anglers arrived in the pool after I got there. The one below me was one of the many, many new breed of fishermen that JW spoke of. (wading to within 50 feet is OK, that's plenty far away, isn't it?)
After moving AWAY from him, and watching as he RAN into what was previously "my water....."

guess what happened! when fish were truly starting to look up a litte, I couldn't move an inch! A guy walked in from above and parked himself between my position and the boat above him. Below me, dead water. How "serene" it was.

JW, I'd fish with you any day. You've said it well.
 
It won't cost the guides a cent for the license fees, they will just pass it along to clients as the reason for fees going up. Just like any other business, as expenses go up the cost of the product goes up. Don't feel sorry for the guides, feel sorry for us.....we should be more outraged than the guides. Of course they also care, too high a cost, fewer trips. So in the end we all suffer.
 
MACFLEA, did I single you out personally? NO. Did I say that I would shoot at another human,NO. Maybe at a group of risers to put them down, not to hurt or mame someone. So now that you have threatened me with a GUN tough guy, PM me and lets set up a day on the cliffs of Weehawken. It makes me all tingly to know that you have shot at humans, bring on Veterans Day.:bootyshak

Rich
 
Now just limiting boats won't be the entire solution to the crowding spoken about above. A boat doesn't fish. A person with a rod does.

The next step would be to put limits on the number of rods per mile of river. Difficult task. It is however done on certain rivers in UK and out west.

Maybe we should limit the number of days an individual can fish with a punch card. These would be sold as a special license and the funds from the cards would pay for "river conductors" who would punch the card much like those on trains. When your card is used up after a certain number of days, you are done for the year or subject to heavy fines if caught on the river by the "conductors".

If the enforcement work, this would allow plenty of space to fish for all.
 
Babyface

Read me previous posts. It was my post that recommended you all put your effort into meaningful work such as lobbying for restrictions on numbers of boats that access the water. Also I never stated you did not have the right to complain about being crowded out by disrespectful guides floating the river or by wading fisherman. Its the superior attitude you have regarding the other fisherman that is beyond ridiculous. Face it Baby you want the river back to the way it was when you fished long ago and it just aint gonna happen. Odds are heavily leaing towards things getting worse.

Fact: The river will continues to get more crowded with people that are not as knowledgable or skilled at flyfishing or by skilled flyfisherman that have been told the Upper D is the best stream east of the Miss.

Fact: If the powers that be ever decide to truly protect the stream and provide for a real coldwater fishery. You will see Chaos on that river that makes the current situation seem like your fishing in the wilderness.

Fact: You dont own the river. You never have and you never will. You could have fished it for 60 years and it would not matter. Others have the right to fish it and will do so.

Fact: Never threatened anyone on this board but did say that if someone were to decide that they wanted to shoot at me with a wristrocket they should be prepared for return fire and that my friend is self defense. You can state that you were talking about putting fish down but I believe you know exactly what you were getting at so lets cut the crap. To be honest, the day someone gets assaulted or worse because of feeling crowded on this river is going to be a sad day indeed.

I do however feel that my post was over the top in regards to the last point so I would like to formally apologize to anyone that was offended by my post. I dont even fish the river any longer so I am not realy as emotionally invested in the river as you, CDUN,Trav, and others are. Growing up in NJ, I am used to combat fishing conditions so having someone 50 feet from me is like having the stream to myself.

Hopefully you are not online now reading these boards. Hopefully you are out there fishing instead.
 
Let's review MACflea,
Fact, you threatened my person, not cool.
Fact, you admit you do not fish the Del. system, probably because your clueless,so,KEEP YOU FESTERING GUBUTIT SHUT.
Fact, I made over 750 e-mails (I went back and counted) and did over 100 mailings at my own expense to improve river conditions.
Fact, apology accepted, NOT!
Fact, the day you can do 1/2 the things I can, you might become a MAN!
Fact, you have a nice day.
Fact, GO METS!
 
Oh, one more thing
Fact, thanks for complementing me on my lady killing GOOD LOOKS!

Rich
 
Babyblue

My apology still stands because, as I said in my last post, the day anyone gets hurt over a river or a trout is a sad day indeed. Whether you accept my apology or not is up to you and not really my problem.

Enjoy whats left of the weekend!!!

PS
Go Mets!!!
 
I've been fishing most of the time since my last post so am just catching up on the b.s. I find one remark in particular about my "rant" being childish pretty funny when many of the "rants" in response were far more childish than me simply honestly calling it like I've seen it.

First and foremost, I don't think in any of my post did I single out novices as second-class fishermen. I said "Real fishermen would identify overcrowding and respect the peace, quiet and space another angler should have while fishing." I think I was 10 when I first starting fishing frequently. I didn't know jack about catching anything or how to cast, but I knew it wasn't cool to fish close to somebody or crowd them out of a spot.

NJFred, the VAST majority of people fishing the upper D. system are newcomers to it. I don't care if they're new to the river(s). I care that they bring their small stream, overcrowded expectations along with them. As was said somewhere above in a response, "I'm from NJ, I'm used to crowded streams." Yeah? That's great. I drive Rt. 78 sometimes so I'm used to tailgaters on my ###. That doesn't mean they drive correctly or that I should aspire to be like them on every road I travel.

The fishing crowd on the upper D. IS increasingly less respectful of those around them. Maybe you in particular are not one of them -- maybe you give a guy enough room to really work and not get squeezed out. But the growing majority fishing the system do not anymore.

I never painted anyone as lazy nor say that I was the only one who walked the river. The contrary, I noted that one can't even do THAT anymore to get away from the crowds -- although the trespassers and those driving the tracks with vehicles I'll gladly label as lazy (amongst other things).

I've never said it wasn't right to float the river. That was CDun. I frankly don't care if you float the river, as long as you give me enough space to fish and don't impose on me by dropping anchor right above me, right below me or right on top of me. Regarding floating, I honestly can't see how anyone's really even enjoying it these days (at least on the WB). It must be a real ##### to have to constantly navigate the gauntlet of wade fishermen flailing away at the water.

Future Fanatic: "if it's so crowded, stay home, because you are part of the problem." Indeed... and sometimes, especially the very crowded times, I do or I hunt out small nooks of water that aren't crowded or I fish elsewhere... However, even when I AM part of the problem, I'm not one crowding out someone else. This weekend, I went elsewhere. The upper D. isn't the only game in town for big wild browns. It's just the trendy one.

EB Wader/NJ Fred -- Without making the river "private," I seriously doubt one could limit the number of people allowed to access it. However, I think a very viable concept would be to create a rotation of sections of water that are open/closed to wade fishermen, float fishermen, etc. at scheduled times and as someone else pointed out, closing sections entirely when necessary to rest the fish. It would make the most sense to base the schedule on flows, and it would probably require PA and NY putting in more access points and more boat launches. I'm sure wade fishermen would support having sections float-free and I'm sure floaters would support having sections wade-free. BUT, I doubt any of those approaches will fly, especially in reading this board and hearing the continued rhetoric about the "rights" so many people claim to have.

MACFLY -- "You dont own the river. You never have and you never will. You could have fished it for 60 years and it would not matter. Others have the right to fish it and will do so." I dare point out again that I DO NOT have the RIGHT to fish the river. I have the priviledge to fish the river and I do not take that for granted. As such, I do my part to behave along the river in a way in good spirit with that priviledge. I don't claim the river as mine and I behave in such a way that my actions don't wrongly impose on someone else's priviledge and opportunity to fish the river. The only place the word "right" should even come into play is when someone is in the water fishing. It's at that point that the angler has the "right" to do so in peace and without being crowded and pinched into a corner.

MACFLY -- "The river will continue to get more crowded with people..."

And that's the truth. But unless you want the fishing experience on the upper D. to feel like fishing Pulaski in October, you best all learn how to give a guy enough space to fish and respect that the space around him at that point in time IS "his space."

Incidentally, I don't live right on the water and I'm not an (immediately) local resident. I think CDun might, but I don't even know him so don't really know. I do think that comment was kind of interesting. It implies that those complaining are locals seeing their home waters invaded. That being the case, cynically, I'm wondering if this is mostly a NJ fishermen's issue. For years, PA residents have complained of the influx of NJ fishermen. Maybe it's just a lot of the NJ fishermen who just don't get it.
 
Please it is wrong to even suggest this is a problem caused by NJ fishermen. That's stereotyping! It's just plain wrong. Further, I would state that The Delaware is my home water. It's what I fish most and enjoy the most.

Closing down sections of the river will not help the crowded conditions. It will only create more wading density on the open sections. Don't you think that if it could be accomplished that limiting the days on the water of fisherman in a boat or wading is the only way to lower the number of rods fishing and ease the overcrowding? Are you willing to fish less to have more space on the Delaware?

I think my solution might work (sell punch licenses and hire River conductors). When your 20 days of fishing are up... you need to fish another river for the remainder of the year or face serious fines if caught with a "punched out" card.
 
Last edited:
Space

The comment was made partially tongue in cheek but also to illustrate a point. Your idea of space does not necessarily correlate with what other people think a fair amount of space would be. I made the comment based on real world experience growing up in NJ fishing heavily overcrowded waters but I think that statement could be made in many states including PA and NY. so clearly it is not a NJ thing. So what is respecting your space. If you are fishing a pool that is 200 feet long and you are at the top is it Ok If someone fishes the bottom of the pool or is that too close. See some people might not care and others might go berserk and that is fundamentally part of the problem. Sure there are more obvious breeches in etiquette and some examples have been given on this board but there are also nuances that aggravate the crap out of some fisherman and would not even be acknowledged by others. I dont ever see this part of the issue being resolved. Hell in NJ it was not uncommon to stand shoulder to shoulder with other fisherman and it was not uncommon to see fisherman come to blows over a 10 inch stockie. Silly but true!!! I had a guy literally cast over my shoulder on a stock day at the South Branch. Walked up behind me about 10 seconds before the 5:00pm start time and could not have cared less if he was sitting on my shoulders. So take that same fisherman who has been literally sitting elbow to elbow and transplant him to the upper delaware and tell him he cant fish within 200 feet of someone else and he may think you need therapy.

Respectfully I fundamentally disagree with you in that fishing is a right and not a privilege. You buy a license and a trout stamp and you are free to fish any pulic water you wish. No privilege must be granted. That doesnt mean someone has the right to trespass on private property or litter or any of that crap but they do have the right to fish by any legal means. Thats just the way it is. Now in my previous posts, I stated several times you can complain about disrespectful fisherman (drift boats and wading fisherman alike) but the fact is it will change very little and the result will only be your elevated blood pressure. You are free to approach your sport as if it were a privilege and perhaps if more people felt the way you do we would see far less of what goes on in the upper delaware and in many other places.
 
JW


The comment about my river and your river is not a crock. It is a perception that is given by some on the board when they make comments such as driftboats have never belonged on the river and never will. Or these novices who cant cast 20 feet and need a driftboat guide to tie their fly and point to the fish. If someone wants to take driftboat down the delaware for the first time in their life because they never floated a river before than that is their GOD GIVEN RIGHT!!!!!. When people say otherwise they are just dead wrong!!! Perhaps they are just upset with the overall situation and are lashing out but that is not the perception that is given. THe perception that is given is that this is my river and you dont belong. Sorry but they do belong. Hopefully they will learn over time to respect the resource and the others that fish it but they may not and unless someone comes up with a fisherman's bill of rights and passes it into law it will forever be an issue.
 
MACFLY said:
If someone wants to take driftboat down the delaware for the first time in their life because they never floated a river before than that is their GOD GIVEN RIGHT!!!!!. When people say otherwise they are just dead wrong!!!

Commandment # 11 : Thou shalt not stopeth fishermen from floatingeth the Delaware.

So it is written; so it shall be.

But what would Buddha say....
 
I am curious what most think is an acceptable distance from the next fisherman, my feeling is that a 75 foot cast is about most peoples limits, so how do we equate what is proper to small, medium and large rivers.....perhaps a poll would be interesting.
 
One observation I have is that the more crowded a stream gets the more the distence shrinks. For example, think about the Beaverkill. I don't fish it much but see from route 17 fisherman standing much closer together than on the Delaware. I haven't heard as many compliants regarding this as the Delaware so I think fishing in closer proximity is accepted more there than on the Delaware.
 
NJFred, re: the Beaverkill I would agree. Those that choose to fish it are used to the crowds (just as those who fish the NJ streams are apparently used to them), but I have heard many complain about it and many do still get territorial over there. I personally don't fish it specifically because of the crowds. I personally don't know another angler who would enter a pool so crowded, and most would leave that pool after it became so crowded. As I said perviously, apparently I'm old school.

The Beaverkill might be a model for what the upper D. will become/is becoming, but if so that's very sad as what makes the upper D. special is being diminished as a result.

MACFLY ... the 200 foot pool. If I were fishing the head of a 200 foot pool, I'd be ok with someone fishing the tail. Someone... one person (or a couple of guys fishing together as some do). But put a guy at the head of the pool and a guy at the tail of the pool and that pool's full. Not on the upper D. these days though. Guys think they can squeeze 1, 2, 3 more guys in there between the head and tail. Make it a 150 foot pool and it starts getting pretty tight with a guy in the head and tail. Make it 100 feet long and you've now pinned somone in. I agree it's all relative, and while I don't agree with your sarcastic quip about an angler bill of rights, I do think given the fishermen densities near urban centers that TU, fly shops and anglers should be much more sensitive to and active in promoting angler etiquette. While you think CDun, myself and others simply complain. We seem to be the few who raise etiquette (especially related to crowding) as an issue. The only shop I've seen mention it is Catskill Flies.

For some reason in most other hobbies and pursuits there are written and unwritten rules of the game... from school yard basketball courts to golf courses to public park tennis courts to everything under the sun. I mean, if there's a pickup game on the court, you don't walk out and start shooting baskets, do you??? Another analogy... if there's a hunter in a treestand, you don't setup in the tree next to him, do you??? If you know someone's hunting an area, you don't go tramping through it to #### it all up for him do you?

Why is it the crowding, cooperation, and etiquette surrounding fishing is held in a different light by so many?

Regarding right, priviledge and licenses -- buying your license is a priviledge in the first place. The fact that you have one doesn't give you rights. It gives you priviledge and permission. The license is permission to act in a way that would be otherwise unlawful. It allows you to fish waters open for fishing. A right is something fundamentally given to all people in society. We do not give citizens the right to fish. We require that they buy a license and follow the terms and conditions of that license. We are in turn granted the permission and priviledge (not the right) to fish the upper D. because the laws state that we can. I only have the priviledge to fish and to fish the upper D. so long as that priviledge is made available to me. I don't take that for granted. The reason I identified this ongoing use of the term "right" in relation to this matter is that I believe it a sign of the ongoing sense of self-entitlement. ... "it's my right. I'll do what I want... regardless of how those actions may impact those around me." That is the growing mentality on the upper D. (and other waters as well) and I believe that mentality is spawning from somewhere other than the local residents of those fisheries (and I'm not one of the local residents).

People need to (re)learn courtesy and etiquette. If you see these postings as simply rants and complaints, then a) you miss the point and b) you don't have to read them. But I'm doing my part to raise awareness of the crowding issue. And we've just been talking about the impact it has on the boaters and waders. We haven't even touched up the impact it has on the fishery itself.

And finally, someone (I think NJFred? or MACFLY?) asked if I'd be happy if laws, etiquette whatever were adopted that meant I fished less but when I did there were fewer crowds. I can without question and definite certainty answer: YES. My days fishing would be a much more enjoyable experience and I think everyone else's would be as well. And, as has been pointed out, there are lots of places to fish, so in most cases there'd always be somewhere else to go on the days I "couldn't" fish the upper D.
 
Jw

JW

I thought your post was great except I doubt you and I will ever agree on whether fishing is a right or a privilege. We may just was to agree to disagree on that aspect of it.

As far as etiquette is concerned, I can give you a lot of non-fishing examples of improper etiquette being displayed almost constantly. On my way to the airport today the guy who cut me off and then gave me the finger. :rant: Or the other day when I was playing basketball, the guy that guarding me was constantly hacking me but did not believe this was the case. Point is I definitely dont think this is specific to flyfishing or fishing in general. In each cast there are examples that are flagrant and others that are much more borderline. When I asked you if it was acceptable to fish the bottom of the pool it was not necessarily to elicit a response it was to demonstrate that everyone's perspective is different on what is Ok and what is not Ok and there always examples of clear breaches of etiquette and others that may not be so clear. Also I wasnt trying to be sarcastic about an angler bill of rights. Again it is to illustrate that there are no clear guidelines and the guy that has spent his life fishing in close quarters may not be impacted as much as the guy who has not had to content with a similar environment.
Take CDUN for example. He remembers the day when little or no driftboat traffic was on the river and now that it has increased substantially it is aggravating him to no end. Others that fish the river might not care as much except when there is an obvious breach of etiquette like if the guide parks his clients right in front of where you were casting (extreme example). Now CDUN sees the pontoon boat fisherman on the river as well and he is ready to bust a gasket. He doesnt want them on the river period. Does not believe the Upper delaware should be floated. I believe you stated you didnt mind as long as they were respectful. So right here you have 2 different opinions on the same subject. If I lumped you in with CDUN in my previous posts I apologize. I respect the fact that you want to approach flyfishing as a privilege.

Rights versus privilege. I will give it one more shot since i am a stubborn irishmen. Privilege is something that is granted to you. An example would be if in place of a license there was a lottery system and only 100 people were could get on the stream in a season (man that would be pretty cool). You were selected and now have the privilege to fish. We dont have that type of system. I can fish any public water I want to fish. It is my right to fish it. I should respect the laws, the resource and my fellow fisherman but I cant be prevented from fishing without some legal justification. Now you are equating rights with entitlement. I can understand why you feel that way given the experience you have had on the upper D. but it isn't the same thing. If I used your definition than I would not have any rights other than what is specified in the constitution. Speaking of which the right to keep and bear arms. According to the constitution this is my right but I still have to buy a license to do this. Does the act of buying a license make it a privilege? If I want to carry my firearm on a plane I have to declare it and fill out paperwork even though the constitution mentions nothing of this.

All of this is a complicated way of saying it is all perspective and nuance stemming from how we approach the sport and what our past experiences have been. My first trip out west to float a river, I was surprised my guide actually had us take a side channel to avoid floating the main section of stream where at least a dozen fisherman were stationed. He politely explained that he has to live and work on this stream for much of the year and wanted to treat those anglers with the respect he would like in return. Made perfect sense once he explained it to me. Since that time I have told some guides to stop or go around or drag the driftboat behind fisherman when the situation calls for it while others didnt need me to tell them as they took it upon themselves. Take it easy JW. I hope the rest of your season brings you blizzard hatches and the company of healthy brown trout not wise ass fisherman from NJ ( Just kidding NJFRED ).
 
Back
Top