I do not critique each post you enter on this site, never claimed to be an expert / never will. I do understand that although a trib is not stocked it does not mean that stocked fish do not enter. But, you must apply this same train of thought to our Pacific trib's, also. Therefore, there are no wild steelhead out west!? That is an illogical, misinformed train of thought. Fantastic that you not only know of the Catt but would selfishly publicize your knowledge of a sensitive fishery on the internet.
Well the almighty tobias concedes that there are wild steelhead in NY! Just not in the streams I fish. Because we've fished together and have shared our favorite spots, right? Although I never claimed the natural reproduction to be prolific, I'll address your misguided question of why the state would continue to stock even IF there were prolific natural reproduction. MONEY. A significant portion of the economy of Oswego County. The ethics of fishing for salmonids coming from Lake O would never allow fish to do their thing, either. Regardless of the forage present within Lake O, the unethical lifting of as many steelhead as possible sitting on a redd in xxxxxx Brook would never allow them to be successful. I have heard of baitfish populations decreasing in Lake O...which would ultimately hurt both stocked and wild fish. Typically, non-native fish out-compete native fish. The only example I can think of that contradicts this scenario is the bull trout.
I, too, agree that the majority of fish I catch are not wild. But there must be some distinction between a fish released in to a river system as a juvenile, as they are in the SR, in comparison to fish released as an adult from a hatchery.
You do know they stock steelies out west? Yet your idea that because they stock on the east, in an area featuring limited natural reproduction, these fish are not wild. But, although they stock out west, in an area now featuring limited natural reproduction, these fish are wild? I do not get it. I have spoken with our Nation's foremost anadramous researcher's about this one and their take on it would surprise even the most scrupulous individual, such as yourself.
Closing the fishery is not the answer, and you're a damn fool if you believe that. Like Pulaski, there are towns out west that rely on salmonid fishermen to boost local businesses. Aside from these folks losing a lot of business, the fishery in itself would most likely not repair itself. A separate, specific measure is numero uno when talking about reviving the steelhead returns out west.
The two streams I mentioned earlier do not receive stockings. They're not on the lists you've wasted your time presenting. I'm sure one of your chronie's read through them, though. Which I bet they're very grateful for - wild charts speaking of stocked fish.
Again, I never thought, nor claimed, that all of the fish I catch are wild. Actually, I just said that I'm grateful for wild steelhead. You had to chime in with your intellect and state that fish are stocked.
Again, I'd be surprised if the State were to cut stocking numbers based on research indicating high levels of natural reproduction. I think the area is no way a legitimate candidate to push for going completely wild. Again, aside from hurting the local businesses tailored to these sportsmen, the lack of ethics involved in fishing in this area would destroy any attempt at reducing stocking counts.
So what makes you an expert? Just because a tributary is not stocked doesn't mean stocked fish don't enter the system. The only place I know of with a high percentage of natural reproduction is Cattaragus Creek and that is a tributary of Lake Erie.
I'm not saying there aren't wild steelhead in NY. But the conditions for successful natural reproduction do not exist in the majority if tributaries in Lake Ontario on the New York side. I'd be interested to know which tribs you are talking about. In fact since it is documented by he state I would like to read the study. Especially since almost all of the tribs I know of get way too warm in the summer for any smolts and yearlings to survive. If natural reproduction was so prolific why would the state stock such high numbers? There is not enough forage base in Lake Ontario for stocked fish and wild fish to compete.
Unless you are fishing in Canada( who's biologists claim 40% of their returning steelhead are from natural reproduction
Ontario's Steelhead - Ontario OUT OF DOORS Magazine » Fishing » Trout ) then I would bet the majority of your fish are stocked fish that ran up what ever trib they came across.
I do know they stock fish on the west coast. Hatchery steelhead are killing off the wild steelhead out there. Throwing more money and weaker hatchery fish at a dwindling wild steelhead population isn't the answer. Closing the fishery and letting Mother Nature run her course is.
Take a look at the steelhead stocking numbers in these counties alone. Don't be surprised if you see your creek on there.
2011 Fish Stocking in Niagara County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
2011 Fish Stocking in Orleans County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
2011 Fish Stocking in Oswego County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
2011 Fish Stocking in Monroe County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
2011 Fish Stocking in Jefferson County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
2011 Fish Stocking in Wayne County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
2011 Fish Stocking in Cayuga County - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Now tell me if you still think all of those fish you are catching are wild.
If biologists in New York thought steelhead natural reproduction was high they would cut stocking numbers. Have you ever been to a state of the lake meeting?